Your browser doesn't support javascript. This means that the content or functionality of our website will be limited or unavailable. If you need more information about Vinnova, please contact us.

Our e-services for applications, projects and assessments (the eServices portal) close on Thursday 26 January at 4:30pm because of system upgrades. We expect to open them again on Friday 27 January at 8am the latest.

Low cost method for measuring moisture in construction materials

Reference number
Coordinator SIGMA CONNECTIVITY AB
Funding from Vinnova SEK 100 000
Project duration November 2016 - February 2017
Status Completed
Venture Bygginnovationen 2011-2014
Call 2015-06960-en

Purpose and goal

The purpose of the project was to identify an appropriate method for measuring moisture in building materials. We found out, that from several studied alternatives the best method is measuring relative humidity in a local air-filled cavity. This is a well-established method in the market today, but in general is only utilized in relatively expensive, complicated and wired systems. However, we believe that this method is very suitable to be adapted to a low cost, wireless and power efficient system.

Expected results and effects

Based on the project´s results, we believe that we are able to develop a measurement system for moisture in building materials with wireless connection to a cloud service, with a battery life time of 7-10 years, and a price of less than 250 kr. Low-cost capacitive sensors for relative humidity may be placed in a local cavity created by the mechanical design of the product. For both radio and battery technology there are many options. Therefore an evaluation of these technologies should be made. However, Sigma Connectivity´s has extensive experience in these areas.

Planned approach and implementation

We have studied four different methods for moisture measurement in building materials: complex relative permittivity, transmission line reflectometry, thermal conductivity, and relative humidity in a cavity. All four seem to work for the purpose. However, the first three have high power consumption and lack of compatibility with concrete. Measurement of relative humidity in a cavity was found to be the best choice. Its advantages are that the cavity can be defined by the product design, the sensors are well available, and they have low price and power consumption.

The project description has been provided by the project members themselves and the text has not been looked at by our editors.

Last updated 25 November 2019

Reference number 2016-04776

Page statistics