Your browser doesn't support javascript. This means that the content or functionality of our website will be limited or unavailable. If you need more information about Vinnova, please contact us.

Our e-services for applications, projects and assessments close on Thursday 25 April at 4:30pm because of system upgrades. We expect to open them again on Friday 26 April at 8am the latest.

Design practice as innovationboost

Reference number
Coordinator Göteborgs Universitet - Business & Design Lab
Funding from Vinnova SEK 760 768
Project duration December 2011 - December 2013
Status Completed

Purpose and goal

The project´s aims to disseminate lessons learned from the previous project has not been met in full, but the experiences gained has reinforced the potential for future utilization. The aim to refine the process has been partially met through experiences that are essential for continued development. The aim to realize design-driven innovation has clearly been met in three of the four cases. The goal of implementing design-driven innovation has been partially met in three of the cases. The goal of creating an exhibition concept for dissemination of experiences has been met.

Results and expected effects

We have made important experiences which means that we can take the next step in the evolution of the process of design-driven innovation. In this development, we will take note of DPIs emphasis on clearer innovation cases and DMIPs emphasis on active coaching, need for places for design-driven innovation and the lesson that implementation takes time. We have also developed an exhibition concept that is well-informed and useful, both as a method for implementation, as a platform for dissemination of experiences and as an experiential commentary on methods, results and experiences.

Approach and implementation

The collaboration between companies and design firms worked well. However, the developed process, with its stronger emphasis on innovation cases, but with a less active stressing of working inside the companies mean that the degree of implementation rate was not as high as we had hoped. We believe that a more active coaching work and an emphasis on companies´ more active involvement in the work, as well as a more extended process in time to promote learning, would have led to more thorough implementation.

The project description has been provided by the project members themselves and the text has not been looked at by our editors.

Last updated 25 November 2019

Reference number 2011-04106

Page statistics